Friday 27 August 2010

Um?

I thought that I should blog, since I haven't in a while. Obviously now it feels like I have nothing to say, which I don't. Hmm. What's been going on?

OH OH I KNOW I DISCOVERED A LOAD OF AMAZING MUSIC YOU GUYS. In order of revelation:



















I Blame Coco featuring Robyn - Caesar

The hotness of a thousand burning loins.




Pet Shop Boys - Heart

The perfect mix of disco and gaymotion.














Robyn - Fembot

The what even so good I can't sorry?


That took far more effort than I thought it would so I'm going to stop now.

I have changed the title of this blog to 'Fembots have feelings, too.' Sorry if this causes a problem.

Saturday 7 August 2010

Some more outrage



As with most things I bitch about on here, I know very little about Buck Angel. I first became aware of his existence through Corin, who is a fan of his on Facebook; essentially, he is reportedly the first FtM porn star, and seems pretty popular. From the little of his online presence that I have researched, I've noticed that he sees himself as a success, primarily because of the authenticity he and others perceive in his masculinity. His bio on Facebook is essentially presented as a wrong body narrative; we are encouraged to see him as an ordinary guy who was unfortunate enough to have been born into a female body.

A few days ago Corin read a status from this page to me and it's been troubling me ever since. It reads:

This was sent to me today. Pretty Cool!

"
My ass.
You have not been a woman.
That's impossible.
You have a bitchin mustasche and you could probably beat a wild
animal to death with your
bare hands.
You look like you could star as a villian in a Die Hard film.
You look like you could demolish a house by headbutting it.
You simply look to convincing to have ever been a woman."


Obviously I have several issues with this. For one thing, 'been a woman' is really problematic terminology - I recognise that this is the terminology of the person writing to Buck, but it is also terminology he tacitly supports by publishing it without criticism. The following account leads me as a reader to believe that both Buck's fan and Buck himself believe women to be inherently inferior to men, and this makes me fucking angry.

According to this quote, it is 'impossible' for women to have facial hair or, at least, facial hair that is so socially acceptable as to be 'bitchin'. Similarly, a woman could not possibly 'beat a wild animal to death'; she could not star as a Die Hard villain; she couldn't have the strength to 'demolish a house by headbutting it'. And, by she, I mean we. We, as women, are weaklings and failures. We can't impress people with our plumage (possibly because, since most women feel under pressure to present themselves in a way that indicates great care has been taken over their appearance, it just isn't special when our hair - non-facial, non-armpit, non-pubic - looks good. It's meant to look that way). We can't take on wild animals - we simply don't have the necessary testosterone levels. We are worse than ordinary - we are substandard because, in the grand competition to be entertaining that apparently is life, we barely have half the physical resources of people signified as male, or 'appropriately' masculine. We don't exist in this conversation except by omission and derision. I am not trying to say that conversations about transmasculinity ought to refer to women - sometimes women are not relevant - but, when heteromasculinity is being so revered, women become present through their silent inadequacy.

What is strength in this conversation? It is destruction, brute force, the ability to literally throw your weight around. Fuck childbirth. Fuck existing in a society that constantly undercuts you - Buck Angel has apparently made a safely-unnoticed exit from the parade of fuckery that assaults most of us who are not heteromen on a daily basis, so it's alright for him. He can become an oppressor of those less 'fortunate' (i.e. less outwardly normatively masculine) than him. I feel very self-conscious about coming across, to myself as well as others, as being transphobic in this complaint but, more importantly than that, I cannot subscribe to something that relies on the subordination of femininity to be 'successful'. Because according to this narrative I am not strong, and I do not have strength. While Buck is made a spectacle - which I do not mean to imply is okay: he is a person, not a freakshow - I am fainting somewhere in a corner, where I am either being attended to by another woman behind the scenes or ignored entirely. As is every other woman. And, essentially, it seems to be that we are being ignored because society has not awarded us the resources to throw our weight around.

This is not to say, though, that the only strengths that can be ascribed to women are separate from those ascribed to Buck (or Buck's masculinity): there are strong fucking women. There are women body builders and women wrestlers and women cage-fighters and women who pull cars with their teeth. Corin remarked, and I think this is totally feasible, that working out to the extent that you become a body builder does basically the same things to any body, be it a woman's or a man's, or male or female, or something else. Are woman-identified body builders too 'convincingly' masculine to be considered women? Are other people's gender the properties of outside critics? I find it disturbing that anyone, let alone a queer person, would endorse these ideas.

And what's 'convincing'? What exactly is being celebrated when Buck Angel is seen to pass? To me, this is not about his personal journey, or his comfort. This is about supporting a gender binary. This is about celebrating the idea that even queers can support this myth, this piece of shit idea that seems to permeate everything, that sits in so many people's heads and dictates so much about how they treat people and how they let themselves act: the idea that the genders are the (perceived) sexes and are opposite and entirely different, and that it's of the utmost importance to assert this at all times. It's fucking bullshit and I'm fucked off about it. I feel like I've probably made a lot of oversights in this blog, because there is so much about gender that I do not know, because I'm angry and when I'm angry I tend to throw rationality to the wind and often debase what I am attempting to defend by being too obtuse to understand, let alone defend, it properly. If you're reading this and you want to call me out, please do. I'd like to talk about this with someone.

Thursday 22 July 2010

Cherry cherry boom boom

1. Lady Gaga says 'cherry cherry boom boom' in a lot of songs. I find this intriguing and kind of want to emulate it with a phrase I would find equally confusing if it weren't me singing it.
2. 'Starstruck' is one of my new favourite songs. I love the sprinkly synthy bits so much - they're so pretty <3
3. I have been fantasising a lot about getting a Gaga piano book and playing songs on my (suddenly working in my fantasies) keyboard at a Feline Groovy open mic sesh. So much?
4. I HAVE JUST FOUND OUT THAT ALISON GOLDFRAPP HAS A WOMAN PARTNER?!?! I mean, I just can't explain what that means to me. I love her. So. Much. And obviously this doesn't mean I'm "in with a chance" slash that's a really horrible way to think about people but I like to think it does. Guiltily.
5. It's been troubling me recently that I'm actually really sexist? Case in point: the other day Corin and I went to a computer cluster on campus and there was a fuck-off white van parked in the MIDDLE of the path outside the building we needed with its doors wide open so it was difficult to get through, and there were two men sat inside eating. After sidling past and getting to the cluster it became apparent that it was being refurbished and so totally wasn't open for Facebook-starved us, and as we left (and joined that day's graduation melee - GOD WHY DO THEY ALL DRESS THE SAME I NEVER WANT TO SEE A FLORAL DRESS AGAIN) I complained to Corin that a. the men had parked the car all up in our grill and b. they didn't bother telling us that the cluster was actually closed and were therefore rude, boorish and entitled scum. She asked me if I'd be saying that if they'd been women and I ashamedly looked at the floor. I mean, I relayed this to Dani just now (SHE CAME OVER IT WAS GREAT) and she was like, but, DIY women painters in vans = hawt, which I suppose is correct, but still, I am beginning to feel very guilty and heteromasculine. Which I do not want to be under any circumstances. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME slash how much of a problem is it? Am I exaggerating? I don't even know.

Wednesday 7 July 2010

Basically a massive whinge

I just had an AWESOME TIME reading lots of blogs I haven't read in ages (Sof Jacques Faith Allie Brosh bit of Angry Greek think that's it) and it made me realise I haven't written in even longer, so HELLO. This shouldn't be very long, partly because I am recovering from a hypo and may sound a bit insane at points because of this, and partly because I get v. limited internet time these days what with not having it in my house and I am meant to be sorting out All The Bills for next year. But I can't right now because I am not fully lucid.

Basically my life recently has been mostly crap with moments of awesomeness. I moved house, and tidied and cleaned everything with only two of my housemates, and am the only person in my current house so have to do lots of things there too. I have yet to unpack hardly anything and the house is a tip because of this. I have to organise getting a first attempt resit for my Romantics exam. My mouse Annie died yesterday. Also on the same day the previous tenants cancelled Virgin so now I only have Freeview to while away my breaks with. Also I on that day I got a letter through the door asking me if I fancied a fuck and leaving a boy's name and number. I don't even know what to do about this - it's totally inappropriate and intrusive and it makes me feel really uncomfortable but it's likely that it was written by someone else so if I call the number and have a go that's like a win for the author, and even if it was written by "Tim" getting attention for it was probably the aim; since it's technically soliciting I could contact the local police but whenever I contact them (twice so far) it's always about sexual intimidation and I know this is irrational but I'm worried that if I do it for stuff that doesn't bother me as much as men following me in cars or men following right behind me up a back street with their hands in their pants then the police might start thinking I'm oversensitive and stop taking me seriously? Also, what if they could, like, be focussing on an actual rape case or something, but then I go along and am like 'I got this message which is probably a joke but I do not find it funny' and everyone's like HUMOURLESS FEMINIST and I obstruct worse things being sorted out? Not that rape really gets 'sorted out' usually but you know what I mean. Also yesterday I got a call from DEBT COLLECTORS and now I have c. 28 hours to pay a £300 bill left outstanding at our old house; Ryan and Sof can come up with their shares, I will have to contact my father for mine which is stressful but I can do it, and Tom is still on holiday (on holiday. At a time like this?! Moving time? I am cross about this and want to talk to him about it but want to do it face-to-face and can't do that until he comes back from holiday) and I tried calling his mum but have as yet had no response and argh. Debt collectors?! GOD. Then I also have to set up TV licence and internet and phone line and TV content and electricity and gas and water. And get a new mouse because they're social and it's cruel to have them by themselves unless it's necessary i.e. they are my old mouse Fran who bit the other mouse's balls off. Also I have therapy every week from which I always leave feeling better but is a lot of WORK and about which I am always apprehensive before I go in. Also I have to revise for two exams. Also I have to read as much as I can for the coming year, having done basically nothing for at least a fortnight. Also today I discovered I do not have enough money even to take a tenner out of my account.

I MEAN. I'm sorry to whine. But this is essentially my life now. Although I am obv not obliged to keep everyone up-to-date about everything. But still.

GOOD THINGS, HOWEVER: Sapphic Traffic was RAD, especially DJing fun and Sof birthday fun and seeing Faith and Ray-Ray was AWESOME, Corin is now here after only being away for a week and that's awesome and if she can get a job in Leeds she will stay for summer which would be lovely, Germany has made me interested in football?? so that's new and interesting, once my room is done it will be lovely, I like reading, I have three pretty comfy sofas in my living room, there are a few beers in the fridge for later on. There is also a lot of Friends on TV, which I appreciate, although accept that there will be less now that I have fewer channels. Julia Downes' EastEnders barbecue is coming up and that will be brilliant, I have decided. Also soon I will hopefully have money.

Thursday 17 June 2010

*frown*

So, I recognise it's possible that I'll do a one-eighty turn and not believe a word of this at some point in the future, but I'm going to say it anyway: I'm feeling a bit uncomfortable about a couple of songs that several of my friends see as awesome lesbian icon flagships but I kind of see as ... like name-dropping, but the name is 'I might be a bit queer but not really LOL money.' Then they get money.

Obviously the first example is Rihanna's 'Te Amo.' I mean, it's a nice video, it's an alright song - but it isn't about queer affirmation: it's about getting into a misunderstanding with a queer woman (maybe leading her on?) and then being sad/gyrating about it. That isn't positivity to me. That's just kind of a mention and then a bit of objectifying/convenient examples. And it isn't balls-out saying 'LOOK AT ME KISSIN' LAYDEEZ' but there is a lot of laydee-on-laydee action (that lots of people I know like watching) but I just ... don't feel it.

Then there's Xtina's 'Not Myself Tonight.' I'm only just listening to Bionic now - I did mean to a long time ago because obv I am really excited about JD Samson and Sia and Peaches being on it, but then Lady GaGa happened and I suppose anyone reading this blog knows how that affected my every breath. ANYWAY, I actually find that song a bit boring - admittedly I have only listened to it a few times, but I'm finding it difficult to motivate myself to get to know it or really understanding why I should. And the whole 'I'm kissing all the boys and the girls' alongside 'I'm not myself tonight' feels insincere and appropriating. Like, this is fun and I'm doing it, but I'm not going to take any responsibility for it. And that just reminds me of Katy Perry. I mean, maybe this is just evidence of some normalisation of homosexuality and queerness - that it gets brought up, and maybe this is somewhere on the way to actually being represented without specifically and crucially heterosexist frames - but I don't really feel like I have time for it even if it is. I just feel like I've sat through this before.

On the plus side, though, Elastic Love is awesome.

Friday 11 June 2010

Just ...

... just that the drops in Alejandro make me crazy happy. That is all.

Wednesday 9 June 2010

Lady DroolDrool

A lot has happened since I last blogged. The main thing is that I am now irrevocably, unstoppably in LOVE with this woman:



I just ... she has got me like nobody. SORRY. But I literally can't listen to any other artist right now. My last.fm is abysmal. It is literally just her. AUGH. Love her. I actually had a dream last night where I was hanging out with the Scooby Gang (not the actual Scooby Gang- the Buffy Scoobies) and we were all preparing for the end of the world but nobody seemed very dedicated, and Buffy was heavily pregnant (and I kissed her), and then Buffy, Willow and I were watching the telly and it was showing Lady GaGa's new video (which I suppose was Alejandro) and suddenly GaGa leaned out of the screen (but not in a scary The Ring kind of way) and kissed me (KISSED. ME) and then she turned into Willow and I turned into Buffy and we were still kissing. It was like the ultimate fanfic experience of anyone ever, i.e. the best experience of my life.

In Other News (assuming there is any), I am trying to establish a daily working habit, which is WEIRD, but going okay. I have the biggest reading list ever for the summer, which kind of worries me with its general size, so I'm trying to read for about three hours a day. It's going pretty much to plan so far; I've not read much in the last two days, but yesterday I was doing Other Taxing Stuff and today I was travelling back to Bristol and celebrating the impending publication of my mother's first poetry collection (!!!!!!!!!!!!! how awesome slash if she wins our wikipedia race I'm going to be well fucked off) so I think it's okay to miss a bit. I'll get back on it tomorrow.

Another key part of my life recently, post-examhorror, has been Fable II. SO GOOD. I mean, I've finished the main quest now and am a bit weary of trying to raise a million gold in order to buy Fairfax Castle and destroy every single gargoyle, but for several days it was fricking RAD and I am very much looking forward to Fable III. Hooray I am making my first real foray into gaming!

I feel like I ought to add lots more to this, but there's nothing that comes to mind, really. I have already mentioned Lady GaGa; I am listening to Lady GaGa right now; earlier I was learning some Lady GaGa songs on the guitar; I recently posted an AWESOME Lady GaGa video to my Facebook feed. I think that's everything covered, really.

Sunday 25 April 2010

Fun fact!

Yesterday I discovered that the myth that women are mostly/only raped by strangers outside of the home first appeared in the eighteenth century. Turns out the emergence of the middle class in Britain and the way in which families began to change led to all this thinking that it was "natural" for women to stay at home while men went out working - and this also led to the removal of servants from the notion of the 'family' and the development of the idea of the 'housewife', which made marriage an employment contract whereby women did the work the servants would have done, except they weren't paid. So obviously it was desirable that women did not leave the physical confines of the home, and rape lies were a good way of ensuring this happened.

It's amazing to me that this myth flourishes so today when it's so OLD. Also (obviously this makes a lot of sense, but I'd never considered it this way before) it came out of a(nother) totally misogynistic and reductive imposed theory of social practice. Essentially, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH EVERYTHING slash this is quite interesting.

Sunday 18 April 2010

One mindless automaton coming up

HI. I'm a bit overwrought this afternoon because Sof and I just watched the season five finale of Buffy and it just reopened all the wounds and made me remember that there is a part of me that will always be broken whether I am aware of it or not. GOD. Buffyupset makes me so emo. Oh, well. A friend just told Sof and me that, when season five ended, she sat in the bath knocking back vodka in a Buffy shotglass sobbing. She is my new hero.

Speaking of which, I just discovered this blog and it is literally the best thing I have ever read. Peals of laughter at every entry. Buffyfanfriendwhoshallremainnameless may be my new hero, but Allie is my new god. AWE-SOME.

In Other News, I did not read as much over the holidays as I intended to so I'm in a bit of a pickle at the moment. So far this weekend I have read some inane eighteenth-century poetry by Thomas Gray and a canto and a half of Don Juan, which I'm actually really enjoying, such that I may now fancy Byron a little bit. Oh, dear. On the plus side, this means that I will read it more quickly than I thought I would. I've also inched a little more along Caleb Williams (WHEN WILL IT END) but to be honest I don't see the end being that nigh. I will be examined on it on the 26th of May. I hope I will have read it by then? And Letters Written During a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. And Lyrical Ballads. Not that that should take too long. Ugh. Obviously all my posts for some time will have at least a section of obligatory workspaz. #hahaWOO

Oh, finally, I have decided to be a vegan again. Sadly this decision came literally the day after I bought a load of Quorn products, so I'm going to have a transitional period until they're eaten, and then next time I buy food it will be non-animal orientated. Most of this is all because I weighed myself the other day and was 10kg heavier than I assumed I was, which kind of led me to face up to the fact that I do not eat as healthily as I could and although I walk everywhere it isn't really enough walking to constitute regular exercise, and cutting out dairy is an excellent way of losing weight, not to mention that moral responsibility and the spectre of guilt and shame are very good ways, if not the best, of keeping me from straying back into gorging myself on eggs. Mother, if you're reading this and worrying, rest assured that I will only be a vegetarian (a very healthy vegetarian, but a vegetarian nonetheless) when I am in Bristol. Good, well. I am going to read some more Byron then read as much Hyperbole and a Half as I can.

Thursday 15 April 2010

Something that has been annoying me of late

Sorry - how can the Conservatives seriously have 'vote for change' as their tagline? Aside from the obvious Obama comparison ridiculousness, they're called the CONSERVATIVES. Clue in the name? Kind of doublethinky? Ridic.

In Other (but related) News my friend Nat Guest has started an awesome project where she rounds up the day's news in verse. It's hilar, and here.

Also, I am back in Leeds now. I should be reading Caleb Williams (it has taken me so very long; I am somewhere towards the end of volume two) but instead I am endlessly clicking on my iTunes icon and wondering why it won't load so I can listen to Evelyn Evelyn. I came home to my EE package; it's very exciting. Exciting exciting, even. (Exciting exciting, even even.) (Sorry.) It includes a really cool sticker with a picture of the twins and 'WHAT EVS', which has led me to decide that I am going to lift the ban on multiple acoustic guitar stickers and cover the thing with awesomeness. One of these stickers will be of Scream Club, because part of awesomeness is understanding that what you value won't necessarily always be there, and that you have a responsibility to be part of what continues it in the world. Also, I still fancy Cindy Wonderful, so.

Wednesday 31 March 2010

A sad story

Tonight I went to see Scream Club. After listening to a few too many Robots songs this afternoon I realised that they were actually quite annoying and I was possibly not in the right place to see them, and so Scream Club became all the more the focus of my evening.

I arrived at the O2 Academy and everyone there was a twatty fifteen-year-old girl bleating incessantly and taking MySpace pictures of herself and her friends. Throughout the evening I saw one woman I thought might be gay, barring Scream Club. This isn’t anything to hold against anyone, but it did make me feel a bit more alienated than I was expecting to be; I later found out from Corin that Scream Club had only sent an email saying they were going to be performing in Britain a few days ago, so I guess those who might have been interested probably weren’t aware.

The first band on were fucking dire. They were called 123 something (123 on? 123 go? Something shit like that) and were comprised of lazy fucking ‘pretty’ boys who seemed to believe that being male and wielding a guitar meant that they were worth something. They sounded like an awful mixture of Low Shoulder, Euphoria Audio and Fall Out Boy – they sang in American accents despite being British. The lead singer was only a performer in that he performed privileged male heteronormativity – he was constantly flirting with the audience in a really sickening, authoritative way, and most of the teenage girls were fucking loving it. I felt grossed out and left to rant at Corin for a bit down the phone.

Upon returning to the room I bought some Scream Club merch, feeling more than ever that they were to be my salvation from marginalisation and general extended fury. I spent £22 at their table on a DIY purse and a t-shirt. The t-shirt was an XL women’s size; I did not get it because it was the last size they had; I got it because it was the size that fitted me. I usually wear a size 14, although I can sometimes fit into a 12 depending on the generosity of the sizing. Size 14 is not fucking extra fucking large. I felt a bit grumpy about this but didn’t pursue it, still mostly excited for Scream Club to come on. It was at this point that a girl a couple of people along from me started repeatedly impersonating a rape alarm. I wanted to tell her to stop because it was triggering and trivialising an important issue but I felt like I'd just come across as lecturing and mental. I also hoped she'd just stop. She didn't.

And then Scream Club came to my rescue. They were wearing awesome stripy DIY suit-y things and looked superb. Cindy Wonderful said that Party Time, their opening track, was about everyone, ‘boys, girls, in-betweens’ getting together and having a good time. There was audience participation (SC: What time is it? Everyone: PARTY TIME!). Things were looking promising. But that was literally the queerest moment of the entire gig.

While they didn’t go so far as to remove all references to homosexual feeling from their lyrics, they cut out swear words and more explicit sexual references. This fucked me off because I thought Scream Club were all about sexual liberation, about being able to be explicit without being told you were being inappropriate or wrong. Turns out I was wrong. They still played And You Belong and Girl, You Look Expensive, but the queerness was only visible if you already knew they were queer; the vocals were not particularly clear and their between-song banter indicated nothing.

The worst twist of the knife came when they closed with Revolution. Cindy, who clearly thought she was being inspirational, was talking about how the song was about the importance of challenging injustice. The examples she used were sexism, racism and ablism. Of course I think these are laudable – but they missed out homophobic?! They didn’t even mention the elephant in the fucking room?! I mean, Jesus fucking God, the three –isms mentioned, whilst barely always fully acknowledged, are the most fucking famous ones, and also the ones which many an ignorant person can (to their minds) unproblematically tell themselves they are tastefully avoiding. They did not acknowledge the insidiousness of prejudice; all they did was tell a roomful of twats that ‘revolution’ was flapping around with fake guns and feeling self-satisfied. Of course you can’t hope to convey every complexity of discrimination in one set, but you could try a lot fucking harder, especially if you’re a band whose core fanbase is comprised of queers who felt they had a home in you. That’s what I felt – I thought they were going to relieve me from feeling misplaced, and represent, or even just acknowledge, my values and identity politics. But nothing of the sort happened – they seemed to be far more concerned with appealing to as wide a demographic as possible rather than staying true to the very principles that they purported to support. I was left feeling disenfranchised and really, really let down – particularly when these people eschew playing Sapphic Traffic, a genuinely positive queer night where the audience would really get something out of seeing them and where they could be fucking real and inspirational, in favour of playing with a bunch of penises with guitars and a band whose every output sounds pretty much the same as all the others. Or the fact that they wouldn’t play ST at all if Staffy didn’t pay far more than she was willing, or even able, to do.

Cindy said they were going to be at the merch table after their set to meet people. At first I left the room, feeling like there was nothing I wanted less than to meet those sell-outs, but then I thought that perhaps I could turn the situation into something positive and just try to encourage them to be a bit queerer, maybe. I imagined telling them about how I’d found out about them, that my girlfriend had told me on the first night we met about the bands she was into, about how they were one of the bands she said were her favourites, along with Team Dresch, and that I’d had no idea who these people were and it was really awesome to discover all this queer music I’d never known before, and how she’d put Internationale on the first mix CD she made for me and how we used to listen to Big Deal at her house all the time. I imagined saying this to them and then casually mentioning that I was surprised that their set wasn’t queerer; not berating them, but just sayin’. But after twenty minutes they hadn’t shown up and Robots were going to start their set in ten and there was no way I could even hope to express this to them once they’d started, and I also realised that I was probably far better at expressive myself in writing, so would be better placed to try to email them or something. I left and called Corin and ranted to her all the bus-ride home.

Now I’m in my house with my mother and dog and some wine. I feel a bit less upset, but still rankling. I have £22 worth of merchandise that I am going to have to seriously work to reclaim. I understand that being out is difficult, I do. But when you are, you make a promise, however tacitly, that you will defend your right to be. When you are an out queer artist, you lead your fans to believe that you will represent them, because you are in a far better position than they to do it. I am not naïve; I don’t think that being an out queer artist is going to give you financial security, or that financial gain doesn’t matter to the artist. But there is a fucking line between compromising and selling out, and tonight Scream Club crossed it. 

Tuesday 30 March 2010

Tomorrow I am seeing Scream Club!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tomorrow I am seeing Scream Club!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's it; I'm just excited.

I am also seeing Robots in Disguise - less exciting, but still exciting. <3

I always vaguely hope I'll meet the most interesting person of my life when I go to gigs by myself but it never happens because I just stand there drinking vodka and looking surly (when the bands aren't on) or crazy (when they are). Also, everyone around me in these situations has never as awesome as I imagine they might be before I get there. In fact, I often just silently judge people to within an inch of their lives.

But, on the plus side and a far more happy/relevant note, I AM SEEING SCREAM CLUB TOMORROW.

Saturday 27 March 2010

EEEEEEEE

This must be short because I woke up 2390487235 hours ago and spent basically all day in a car with a dog wriggling all over me BUT: I listened to Evelyn Evelyn (by Evelyn Evelyn) for the first time and since then I have been unable to listen to anything else because it is SO GOOD. I. Love. Amanda. Palmer. And Jason Webley is probably excellent, since he's involved in this, which is fucking RAD. I'm in no fit state to be eloquent but for now I'll just say that it is theatrical to the max and fucking beautiful. So tragic! So haunting! Awesome! Current favourites include Evelyn Evelyn, You Only Want Me 'Cause You Want My Sister (my FAVE), My Space, and the Love Will Tear Us Apart cover which, in my extremely overexcited opinion, is the best rendition of the song that I have ever heard. (I am not really a Joy Division fan. I heard the song too many times in dingy indie clubs in Bristol full of gropey misogynists pretending their pretensions to meaning meant their actions were fine. Well, that and their penises. ANYWAY.) I am extremely pleased. I AM ALSO SEEING THEM NEXT MONTH. Wowzers in my trow-zers. I can't *wait* until I'm back in Leeds to enjoy the (hopefully delivered) presale package that entitled me to these mp3s a week early.

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Thursday 18 March 2010

Some alarming facts about Ann Widdecombe

I am watching 'The People's Politician' on BBC2 at the moment, which heavily features Ann Widdecombe. Tom asked me what I thought of her and I said I had a soft spot for her but had no idea why, so I decided to learn some more about her (on the Be All And End All Of Truth, ie Wikipedia). Here are the things I found most troublesome:
- she converted from CofE to Roman Catholic following the Church of England's decision that women could become priests
- she opposed the repeal of Section 28 (and opposed fifteen out of seventeen motions for equal rights for homosexuals - the two she did not vote against were the two she did not turn up to vote about)
- in 2009, she said, 'there is no climate change. Hasn't anybody looked out of the window recently?' (She has apparently expressed a variety of views on this issue. However, I think saying things like this when your opinions can affect not only what parliament decides to do but also potentially others' views, regardless of what else you've said, is dangerous and irresponsible. Has she *read* anything on the subject?)
- in 1996 she defended the government's policy to shackle pregnant women prisoners with handcuffs and chains when giving birth in hospital (THIS IS THE ONE I FIND THE MOST DISTURBING)

So I don't really have much of a soft spot for her any more. I kind of think she's a bit monstrous.

All information in this post is pretty much copied verbatim from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Widdecombe

The Vajayjay Monologues

Last week, the School of Culture and Performance (or whatever) put on The Vagina Monologues. Ryder noticed that it wasn't either week surrounding Valentine's Day, which isn't in keeping with Eve Ensler's seemingly excessive performance rules (apparently she dictates costumes and set and everything? I mean, not that I don't have any understanding of artistic ownership, but let yr frickin' baby grow up, Ensler). Anyway, that's a sidenote. The important thing is what I thought of it. Which was considerably less than I was expecting to.

TVM was quite a formative part of my formative years - I bought a copy of the book from Fopp for about £3 when I was thirteen or so and, for some reason, was pretty interested in it. I especially liked My Short Skirt, and the monologue about all the different types of moans. When I was nineteen and in my gap year some local feminists were putting on a showing, which I auditioned for and got a role in - due to some fuckery, which I won't go into because it's tedious and beaurocratic and long ago and also I'm still a bit cross about it, I didn't end up being in it after all (N.B. this experience is not accountable for any ill-feeling I have towards the play, just FYI).

Then comes Friday night. Corin and I went alongside (not really with - we missed the preceding Old Bar gathering) the feminist society. I was quite looking forward to it, since it'd been present in my consciousness for some time but I'd not seen it before. Then it started and I felt immediately out of place, like I should have been catapulted into the past but actually it was the present and it was actually a bit embarrassing. I mean, some bits were good - the woman who performed the moaning monologue was especially good - but overall it was quite shambolic, which I think was more to do with the script than the actors. It seems to aim to represent women of several different backgrounds, but in this attempt it only really succeeds in othering those who are not straight, white, and middle-class. The attempts to represent queerness where patchy - as before, the moaning monologue was done well, but the woman talking about her seduction by an older woman as a teenager just wasn't convincing, and I don't think that's just because of the performance. (Also, PROBLEMATIC - if that monologue were about a teenage girl's experiences with an older man it wouldn't have been 'acceptable', so I suppose women just can't be sexually predatory or abusive in the same way.) Furthermore, the intermissions of images of acid burn victims in Asia was not made congruent with the rest of the pieces - which mainly amounted to middle-class women voicing concerns - which completely othered them. The assumption seemed to be that these women *should* be in a society like ours, that they would want that. I'm not saying that many people would *want* to be in societies in which 'honour' killings etc are accepted, but our presumed superiority was all over the whole thing.

Also, and I think most importantly, I think something like TVM just doesn't do now what it may have done (or sought to do) when it first came about. Most women in the room were feminists, most women I know know where their clitoris is, and probably more know that they are worthy of liberation. I think we're living in a post-Vagina Monologues state of consciousness, and I don't think it has much political weight, particularly since it is only accessible to people of a very specific group, and fails to offer that group much in the way of feminist realisation that is inaccessible anywhere else.

Tuesday 9 March 2010

I KNOW this is my third post today but

Tom found a sticker in some toilets today on campus emblazoned with 'Speak out against feminism and the demonisation and scapegoating of men'. Nobody in the Peanut Gallery (which has been recently saved, hooray!) could figure out who or what produced it. We are all very interested. I personally would like to have a debate with them. And by 'debate' I mean 'let them know that feminism is actually about gender equality and they even have a feminist society whose Facebook group page encourages men to join and challenge outmoded perceptions of genders'. Ryder says we should make some stickers with 'Speak out against sexism and the demonisation and scapegoating of feminists' and put them where the previous ones were.

Today

Something really annoying just happened.

Picture the scene: I am settling into a seat in Conference Auditorium 2 for a lecture on eighteenth-century literature. I am alone; there is nobody around me to whom I can quietly rant/at least gesticulate. Behind me are two students, a man and a woman, bitching about all the reading they have to do. Then THIS happens:

She: God, and we have to read Mansfield Park this week.
He: Ugh, that's just a load of feminist crap.
She: Mansfield Park is not feminist!
He: It's written by a woman, and it's shit. [she giggles] That's feminist.
[LIZ DIES]

Obviously I was in no position to question this self-assured DICK CHEESE because the lecture started (it turned out to be on landscape and nature again - why is it that whenever I actually turn up it's to the boring ones?). Anyway, I was totally disinterested, and there was no way for me to conveniently leave since I was in the middle of the row, so I started Mansfield Park. Which so far has yet to be feminist or "feminist."

The hour before this lecture was my eighteenth-century lit seminar, in which I had to give a presentation on James Thomson, Anne Finch and Mary Leapor's nature poetry. I spent most of it talking about the gender personifications in Thomson's 'Spring' - how the masculinised aspects of nature are imperial, powerful and, at one point, literally penetrative, and how the feminised aspects of nature are smiling and willing, how gales only 'sigh', and how feminised Nature's assets are separated into desirable and not desirable (there's a line referring to the 'moist Meadow' and the 'wither'd Hill'). After I'd spoken my tutor said something along the lines of 'that's a really interesting point; I've read this poem hundreds of times and I'd never realised that. I'll never be able to read that moist line again!' I mean, I recognise that of course not everyone has the same research interests as me in this field, but I'd always assumed gender was pretty rudimentary; my tutors in the past have never flinched to bring it up, and I've certainly never been in a situation before where my observations about what a text says about gender (or that a text says something about gender) have been met with such surprise.  Then I was thinking about my previous tutors and I realised that the majority of them have been feminists, so maybe I've just been super-privileged until this point. But still. Weird. She's working in an institution whose English exam papers and essay questions always, always include a gender question.

Finally, and less angrily (although I will likely get angry about this when the time comes) I discovered this morning that Germaine Greer is giving a public lecture in a fortnight at Leeds Met. I'm pretty excited; I hate her so much. I mean, I've not studied her works or the period so I have only a dim idea of what she did for second wave in the seventies; all I know about her really is what she's said when wheeled out onto Newsnight Review and what other feminists have said about her attitudes towards more contemporary feminist concerns. From this I have deduced that she is a belligerent, sanctimonious, self-serving twit of a transphobe. Corin feels very similarly, although I haven't asked her what she knows of Greer so please don't anyone assume she's as ignorant as me. We're both really looking forward to it. It'll be good to actually experience some of her ideas first-hand - either I'll end up with fewer things to be angry about or my anger with her will gain something resembling authenticity. Woo!
Sof wants me to write a blog (how many blogs I follow by people I know have started with some permutation of this sentence recently). I was thinking about what to write about, and it struck me that I pretty much literally just talk about work, which is LUDE. The problem is, I now don't know what to talk about.

............................

Oh, I saw Alice in Wonderland the other day. It was (overall) awesome! I mean, I didn't really like the ending (Alice's 'freedom' means she becomes a capitalist, great) and the DANCING was problematic; I think I was also expecting more of a Tim-Burton-amazing-wow feeling, which I didn't really get. However, Helena was amazing - very who's Queen? - and Anne was superb. I think I laughed every time she came on screen. She was great. Also, it was my first 3D experience, and it was so amazing? It was nice feeling how I imagine it must have felt when colour film first came out. Wowee.

Also, on Saturday we went as a house to see Bjorn Again and it was a literal spectacle. We were at the front dancing VERY enthusiastically, and Agnetha kept singing at Ryan! Their performance was so fun - I was especially impressed with the women, because we were tired enough belting out the songs, and they had dance routines and everything on top of that. Afterwards we hung out outside with some other 'die-hard fans' (they were a lot older than us and we were somewhat hypocritically bothered by them) and then we met Agnetha (! ! !) who was very nice and said that our enthusiasm had given their performance more energy. WOW. Also, it was very apparent that she wasn't in fact Swedish and Ryan said a little plaintively, 'so you aren't from Sweden?' and she replied, 'no, I'm from Chesterfield!', and we all lolled, and she signed our tickets/ABBA money. Then we went to the Old Bar and discussed our glorious experience. It was really nice to spend time with everyone :o)

Monday 8 March 2010

Friday 5 March 2010

Doo-doo-doo, we're onto you

I've just realised that part of the reason that my current mice, Annie and Egg, are much nicer and/or less mental than my previous mice, Hamlet and Fran, is possibly because I used to smoke weed all the time and now I don't. It definitely affected Hamlet and Fran when I had it - they'd hurl themselves on their food and run around like lunatics - and so I think it's likely that it had longer-term effects on them as well, not least because I used to smoke quite a lot, and would usually do so in my room. I've not done this since I got the new mice - in fact, I've not smoked in my room at all - and they're so much calmer and more pliable. Neither of them have bitten me yet, or anything. I mean, I'm aware that female mice are less likely to be aggressive because they're generally less testosteroney, but I don't think that's the sum of the reason for the massive difference between their behaviours. I feel sad about this, like a bad mother, except there is literally nothing I can do to try to change this because Hamlet and Fran are dead now. Fran was so violent that he once tried to bite Hamlet's balls off - we don't know whether he was successful because Ry and I know nothing about mouse anatomy, or really about bollocks in general, but Hamlet definitely bled a lot and if they were still there they must have receded or something. Note to self: do not attempt to support life when you're too self-indulgent to even support your own.

Naturally, I am avoiding working on my Frankenstein essay, which I know is silly because I love the book and I got two seemingly exciting books out of the library about it. Ugh. Maybe I'll tidy my room. It is, of course, a pit of despair. And I need to install my new bookcase and get rid of the old one which has been broken and ugly since I brought it in from the road outside my house.

Saturday 27 February 2010

>:(

"No, I am not going to punch you in the uterus. However much I'd like to."
Today has been alternately lovely and fucking awful. Corin and I were going to celebrate the end of essaygate by getting up early and going to Tropical World, but we ended up sleeping until about two because it turns out that, when you've been solidly stressing and working for seemingly forever, all you really want to do is lie in your girlfriend's bed dozing as much as physically possible. So that happened instead, then she got up and made the BEST BRUNCH EVER. I mean, I have literally never been cooked anything better at the start of my day. It had fakon, Cauldron sausages, scrambled egg, FRIED HALLOUMI, and lots of other tasty things. Omg. I was very happy. I now look back on those simple times with an overwhelming ache in my ruined heart, not to mention other organs.

But I'm jumping ahead of myself. We watched lots of Buffy which, after seeing the poster in my room and dismissing my passion as 'ridiculous' and the programme as 'crap' without having ever actually watched it, then being forced to watch the first couple of episodes whilst stoned and therefore slightly more incapacitated than normal, Corin is now obsessed with (hooray!). UNfortunately, despite the joy this afforded us, this is when my problems began, i.e. my period started. Thus followed a fucking excruciating day. I mean, my first day is always The Painful One, but this one's been much worse than any in recent memory. I decided at length to have a boiling hot bath and read some Frankenstein (apparently I work every day now, what is that?!), which was quite nice, particularly given the disturbingly noisy but ultimately pleasing jacuzzi function in Corin's bath (seriously, what kind of fucking student accommodation is this). Also, I really like Frankenstein. While I was in the bath Corin went out to buy me nice things, like painkillers and rum to have with hot milk and honey and Greek yoghurt and Really Light Ribena and a Galaxy bar and also some surprise icecream, because she is lovely. But then my period pains started again, and I spent about fifteen minutes on the toilet, before flumping downstairs and writhing around in agony for a bit. Corin suggested I lie on my back with my feet against the wall, which made me feel better for a bit, until The Agony Returned to such an extent that I started crying on her. Ludicrous. I am now in the aftermath of this - the pain is still here, but not so bad, and I now have more rum and hot milk, and Corin is drawing graffitis for her friends on Facebook while we listen to Metric. (Omg can't wait to see them in May omg omg omg so excited. Actually, on a sidenote, I am going to have the best April/May EVAR - Men and Evelyn Evelyn in April, and She & Him and Metric in May. What? Oh, yes, that's just my amazing life there. ANYWAY.) The problem is, today I have had a 500mg paracetamol and two Nurofen Expresses and I have yet to be freed from the vice in my womb, and I wanted to go to a femsoc-orientated partay this evening that I very much doubt I will make now. Ugh.

Monday 22 February 2010

douche

This week (slash by Friday at 4pm) I have to write an essay about the problem of 'female beauty' in Alexander Pope's 'The Rape of the Lock' and another essay about the relationship between adulthood and childhood in Songs of Innocence and Experience (I think - I have yet to plan this essay so it is, helpfully, subject to change). So far today I have set my alarm for eleven, woken up at one, faffed around since one, and continued to faff by writing this post. I need to be in uni by quarter to seven at the latest this evening to be in charge of a FemSoc film night. Afterwards I will probably eschew continued social contact on the grounds of work then come home and faff around then go to bed late. Tomorrow I have two lectures and a seminar for which I need to do a buttload of reading. The day after I have CBT, which is early, but draining; the following day the English department is on strike, which is nice, but makes Friday hell because I have to do the lectures/seminars I missed as well as the ones I am scheduled for. One of the ones I am scheduled for requires that I read Letters written in Sweden, Norway and Denmark beforehand. Once again, I hate myself for leaving everything too late and sacrificing my creative freedom for what only amounts to a grotesque lack of discipline. Obviously I am doing nothing to help the matter by whining on here. Argghhh. ARG.

Thursday 28 January 2010

I love another, and thus I hate myself

LOOK AT HER


LOOK AT MY FUTURE WIFE

(she is all I can think about)
(I finished TEDTWOF and now my life is over)

Thursday 21 January 2010

The point of this song would have to be so long

My humours are EXTREMELY imbalanced; it feels at the moment like I am spending most of my time ejecting phlegm from my body, and it's horrible. Corin tried to convince me that actually it was cool 'because you get to look at your phlegm after you've coughed it up' but, frankly, I don't think that makes my situation okay. On the plus side, I am also spending a lot of time reading The Essential Dykes To Watch Out For, which she got me for Christmas, and watching True Blood (I recently bought a subscription to Megavideo premium and, without wanting to sound like I'm practising product placement, I don't really understand how I used to survive without it?). Naturally, in spite of examgate being over, I have a shitload of things to do that I am not doing. Mostly I try to justify it by telling myself I'm too ill to pen an impressive CV or make a start on this semester's reading list or work on emotionally-draining emails. Which, to be fair, might be salient? Possibly? Just a bit?

In Other News, I'm grumpy about Herbal Essences. Despite resisting buying any of their products for some time because apparently they test on animals (even though the shampoo I was using instead was made by Dove who also apparently test on animals - I am a shit vegetarian and even worse human being) and also because I'm wary of any overwhelming product smells becoming affixed to the way in which people around me experience my presence, I was shopping the other day (read: throwing all my money away in a soulless bid to compensate for the massive stretch of time since the last time I 'went shopping') and saw some that was specifically for curly hair and decided on an impulse that this would definitely be a good thing for me to invest in. Having felt a bit uneasy about it every time I go for a slash and am confronted by the frankly gargantuan purple tubs slumped on the edge of the bath, things came to a head this morning when I decided to read them. Error. HE had chosen for their consumers' intellectual stimulation to comment on the MASSIVE DIFFERENCE between men and women; today I discovered that, not only do women, when in the bathroom, spend far more time than men washing their hands, but also that the average groom is 5.3 years older than the average bride. I'm aware that my recent overdose of DTWOF may have prompted me to be more neurotic about world issues etc, but wtf? Seriously, everyone. Forcing expectations of heteronormative practice much. What is WRONG with people? Imagine the board meeting in which suggestions for these 'fun facts' were invited. Do they think, perhaps, that if the 'difference' between men and women is exaggerated enough, then we're less likely to mind the cavernous gap between the rights that we can expect to enjoy? Or the inadequacies of assuming a gender binary? UGH. I hate that this shit is read as normal by most people. On Monday, I went to see Men, which was, by and large, the greatest experience of my recent life (amazing queerfun danceparty lifeaffirming omg, plus I *met* JD Samson omger). However, it was slightly marred by the fact that not everyone around me was not a twat; I became distracted by this guy behind me and his friend who repeatedly asked each other 'is that a man or a girl?' about JD. I turned around and told them she identified as a woman, to which they responded with 'OH, it's a GIRL'. I said, 'no, SHE'S a WOMAN', and they looked confused and nonplussed by my vehemence, and I decided it was not the best time to launch into knowingly-futile-attempt-at-education mode, so turned back to the AMAZING ONSTAGE SPECTACLE and tried not to let myself be more angry than inspired. Later on in the set, a woman leant over to the men behind me and squealed, 'I just found out that's a woman!', and they were like 'I KNOW!', and I just wanted to die/punch everyone. Why is it so important to be able to place people? Why can't people take anything that even slightly bucks their perceptions of gender normality? Why does there have to be a gender normality? Why don't people consider listening to accounts of gender that differ from what they're comfortable with? Why do people have to put up with this shit? It's a horrible way to have to live.

Monday 11 January 2010

I am obviously meant to be revising, but

Today I discovered that, in the seventeenth-century, 'hell' was slang for 'vagina'.